• Richter v. Oakland Bd. of Educ.

    Richter v. Oakland Bd. of Educ. Supreme Court of New Jersey September 14, 2020, Argued; June 8, 2021, Decided A-23 September Term 2019, 083273 Opinion JUSTICE LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal raises two compelling issues for resolution...

  • G.M.M. v. Kimpson

    G.M.M. v. Kimpson United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York July 29, 2015, Decided; July 30, 2015, Filed 13-CV-5059 Opinion  [*128]  MEMORANDUM & ORDER Jack B. weinstein , Senior United States District Judge : Table of Contents...

  • Cary v. Bellingham

    Cary v. Bellingham Supreme Court of Washington, Department One November 13, 1952 No. 32091 Opinion  [*468]   [**115]  October 4, 1951, the city of Bellingham adopted ordinance number 6784. The ordinance, among other things, required that all employees...

  • Burdis v. Withrow

    Burdis v. Withrow United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Northern Division November 19, 2002, Decided Case No. 00-10268-BC Opinion OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS The petitioner, Dominic Paul Burdis...

  • Bryson v. News Am. Publs.

    Bryson v. News Am. Publs. Supreme Court of Illinois October 24, 1996, FILED Docket No. 79712 Opinion  [*83]   [**1212]   [****200]  CHIEF JUSTICE BILANDIC delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiff, Kimberly Bryson, brought an action against the...

  • Akers v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.

    Akers v. Sanderson Farms, Inc. United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Western Division January 8, 2015, Decided; January 8, 2015, Filed Case No.: 7:13-CV-1296-RDP Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the court on...

  • Rosiny v. Schmidt

    Young attorneys, who acquired their mother's shares in a corporation, entered into an agreement with the elderly shareholders to purchase their shares when they died. The attorneys did not draft the agreement and there were no deceptive or high-pressured...

  • Morrison v. Berry

    In March 2016, soon after The Fresh Market (the "Company") announced plans to go private, the Company publicly filed certain required disclosures under the federal securities laws. Given that the transaction involved a tender offer, the required...

  • Lopez v. S. Cal. Rapid Transit Dist.

    Plaintiffs Lopez et al. (the victims) alleged the following facts. Defendant, Southern California Rapid Transit District, (hereafter RTD) is a public corporation engaged in business as a common carrier for hire transporting members of the general public...

  • State v. Andrews

    While visiting an aquarium in California, Joseph Andrews videotaped passers by, including children, which was a legal act. An off-duty police officer noticed Andrews’ actions. At the time, California was on edge because of a recent, notorious child...