Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.
June 29, 2024

California: COVID-19 and the Fraudulent Concealment Exception

When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Generally, an employee injured in the course and scope of their employment is limited to remedies under California’s Workers’ Compensation Act (act) (Lab. Code, § 3600(a...

June 29, 2024

California Workers’ Comp Med-Legal Costs Up Sharply Under New Fee Schedule

Oakland, CA -- Payments for medical-legal evaluations and reports used to resolve medical disputes in California work injury claims have increased more than expected since a new Med-Legal Fee Schedule (MLFS) took effect in April 2021 according to a new CWCI study, with the average payment for a comprehensive exam up 52%, primarily due to new per-page fees for record review that are paid on top of flat fees for med-legal...

June 20, 2024

California Compensation Cases June 2024

CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 6 June 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE Lexis+ Online Subscribers: You can link to your account on Lexis+ to read the complete headnotes and court decisions, en banc decisions, writ denied summaries, panel decisions...

June 19, 2024

California: Questioning the Vocational Expert; Criteria for Vocational Reports

By Hon. Robert G. Rassp and Hon. Clint Feddersen Questioning the Vocational Expert [a] Depositions Counsel will often need to take the deposition of the vocation expert. Live testimony of a vocational expert can occur only on a showing of good cause [ see [b], below ]. Vocational experts are now like medical physicians—their reports are admissible if in a proper form required by statute [ see Lab. Code, §...

June 17, 2024

CWCI Examines California’s Proposed Presumption for Agricultural Heat Injuries

Oakland, CA – A bill that would give a presumption of compensability to farmworker heat-related injury claims if the employer is found to be out of compliance with Cal/OSHA’s outdoor heat illness prevention standard would likely create more challenges than it would solve, entail significant administrative friction costs, and is unlikely to have an appreciable impact on agricultural worker safety according...

June 13, 2024

California: When Is an Expedited Review of a Treatment Request Required?

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Utilization Review (UR) to determine the appropriateness and necessity of requested medical treatment in a timely manner based on accepted medical standards and guidelines has been a mandatory component of California’s workers’ compensation system for over two decades. In that...

May 29, 2024

California: Appeals Board Panel Clarifies Scope and Intent of Labor Code § 4663(d) Disclosure Requirement

Appeals Board panel revisits Hardesty By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the first lessons learned by practitioners new to the field of workers’ compensation law is that proceedings before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) are governed by specific provisions of the Labor Code and the Rules...

May 29, 2024

California Compensation Cases May 2024

CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 5 May 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE Appellate Court Compensation Case Lexis+ Online Subscribers: You can link to your account on Lexis+ to read the complete headnotes and court decisions, en banc decisions...

May 17, 2024

California: A Look at the Distinct Roles of Evaluating Physicians

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The medically related intricacies of a California workers’ compensation case are varied and often confusing. Acronyms abound. They include agreed medical evaluator (AME) and qualified medical evaluator (QME), medical provider network (MPN), primary treating physician (PTP) as well...

May 08, 2024

California: Noteworthy Independent Medical Review (IMR) Decisions (May 2024)

LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis Commentary for each selected IMR is provided below. Many of these IMR decisions were reprinted in California Compensation Cases , which can be accessed on Lexis+. The list discusses specific IMR opinions which explain...

May 03, 2024

California: A Guide to Complex Issues: Presumption of Permanent Total Disability, Progressive, Insidious Disease and More

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Appeals Board panel decisions that rescind a WCJ’s decision and return the case to the trial level for further proceedings and decision generally are not featured in this e-newsletter. The rationale is logical—the dispute may resolve on remand and/or the new decision following...

April 23, 2024

California: Procedure for Obtaining a QME Panel in a Different Specialty in a Disputed Case

Board Panel Opinion Provides a Succinct Explanation By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The process for determining medical issues in a workers’ compensation claim sometimes seems unduly complex and confusing. Labor Code sections 4060 - 4068 establish how medical issues are determined, and the procedures vary depending...

April 18, 2024

California Compensation Cases April 2024

CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 4 April 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE Appellate Court Case Not Originating with Appeals Board LexisNexis Online Subscribers: You can link to your account on Lexis+ to read the complete headnotes and court...

April 18, 2024

California: Shipley Doctrine Lives, Continues to Safeguard Due Process Rights of Litigants Before the WCAB

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Several months ago, an article in LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation Newsletter discussed Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd . (2023) 97 Cal. App. 5th 1213 , 89 Cal. Comp. Cases 1 ( Zurich ), in which the 2nd District Court of Appeal held that the 60-day time...

April 10, 2024

California: ERISA and Federal Preemption Claims vis-à-vis Workers’ Compensation State Requirements

By William Tappin, Esq., Law Offices of Tappin & Associates, Sierra Madre, CA There has been a lot of confusion with respect to whether ERISA preempts state laws regarding numerous programs, including mandatory workers’ compensation coverage by employers. By way of background, it should be noted that some brokers were selling programs as a replacement for workers’ compensation coverage. These were...

April 09, 2024

Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Case Spotlights (Spring 2024)

By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated. Employee Fraud. While the vast majority of workers’ compensation claimants follow the rules, speak truthfully, do not exaggerate symptoms, or otherwise unethically attempt to maneuver within “the...

April 03, 2024

California Compensation Cases March 2024

CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 3 March 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review © Copyright 2024 LexisNexis. All rights reserved. CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE LexisNexis Online Subscribers: You can link to your account on Lexis+ to read the complete headnotes and court...

April 01, 2024

California: A Successful Flight with Kite Ain’t What it Used to Be

By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It has been over a decade since the 2nd DCA (District Court of Appeal) denied writ in the case of Athens Administrators v. W.C.A.B. (Kite) (2013) 78 Cal. Comp. Cases 213 (writ den.). Yet, during that entire ten-year span, not one District Court of Appeal has weighed in on the Kite issue. In fact, Kite was the only “Addition...

March 21, 2024

California: Incompetency and Proceedings Before the WCAB

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Among the varied duties of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) is the determination of the competency of an injured employee or dependent. (Lab. Code, § 5408). Upon a finding of incompetency, the WCAB may appoint a guardian-ad-litem or conservator, and until such appointment...

March 13, 2024

Analyzing the Pandemic’s Big Shift in Working from Home: Productivity, Innovation, Working Arrangements, Pay

By Christopher Mahon, LexisNexis Insights Contributing Author In 1965, less than 0.5% of American workers worked from home. Due to technological innovation in the late twentieth century, that 0.5% rose to 7% by 2019. By June of 2023, 28% of full working days were being worked from home. This big shift, made possible by technology, was catalyzed by the pandemic. Researchers are now analyzing how the big shift has changed...

March 13, 2024

California: Defendant’s Liability for Post-Award Compensable Consequence Injuries

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Even carefully crafted stipulations that purport to limit an employer’s liability for medical treatment to conditions or body parts not specifically listed in the stipulations will not insulate the employer from liability for future medical treatment even more than five years after...

March 04, 2024

California: Is the Good Faith Personnel Action Defense to a Claim of Psychiatric Injury Illusory?

By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Claims of work-related psychiatric injuries have a fraught history. In 1989 as part of the Margolin-Bill Greene Workers’ Compensation Reform Act, Lab. Code § 3208.3 was adopted with the intent of reducing the proliferation of claims of psychiatric injury by raising the compensability...

March 01, 2024

CWCI Study Examines Cumulative Trauma and Litigated Claims in California Workers’ Comp

Oakland - A new California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) study shows that almost half of all litigated claims in the LA Basin are cumulative trauma (CT) claims that involve physical or mental injuries that arise over time from repetitive stress, motion, or exposures, rather than from a specific event or accident. The CWCI study, based on a sample of 1.4 million California work injury claims with 2010...

February 26, 2024

California: Noteworthy Independent Medical Review (IMR) Decisions (February 2024)

LexisNexis has selected some recently issued noteworthy IMR decisions that illustrate the criteria that must be met to obtain authorization for a variety of different medical treatment modalities. LexisNexis Commentary for each selected IMR is provided below. Many of these IMR decisions were reprinted in California Compensation Cases , which can be accessed on Lexis+. Lexis+ subscribers can access those particular decisions...

February 21, 2024

California Compensation Cases February 2024

CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 2 February 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE LexisNexis Online Subscribers: You can link to your account on Lexis+ to read the complete headnotes and court decisions, en banc decisions, writ denied summaries...