Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
Oakland, CA -- Payments for medical-legal evaluations and reports used to resolve medical disputes in California work injury claims have increased more than expected since a new Med-Legal Fee Schedule...
In computing the social security offset required under Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220, the state’s Department of Labor and Industries need not adjust the claimant’s wages for inflation, held a state appellate court. The statute requires that a claimant’s workers’ compensation disability benefits be reduced by either the amount the person receives in social security benefits or by an amount calculated under 42 U.S.C. § 424a(a), whichever is less. The amount of the offset under 42 U.S.C. § 424a(a) is ordinarily the amount by which a claimant’s combined monthly disability and social security benefits exceed 80 percent of the claimant’s “average current earnings,” which, in the case of the claimant, was equal to one-twelfth of the claimant’s highest annual earnings during the year of disability: 1983. Here the DLI calculated the offset under 42 U.S.C. § 424a(a) based on the claimant’s 1983 earnings. He argued that DLI should have adjusted his 1983 earnings to present value when calculating his offset. Indeed, a present value adjustment would have lowered the amount of the offset considerably. The appellate court rejected the argument, holding that § 51.32.220 and 42 U.S.C. § 424a(a)(8) unambiguously required that the offset be calculated using claimant’s unadjusted 1983 income.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Birgen v. Department of Labor and Indus., 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 745 (Apr. 7, 2015) [2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 745 (Apr. 7, 2015)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 157.03 [157.03]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site