By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
A Virginia appellate court affirmed a finding of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission that had apportioned an injured employee’s disability based on her preexisting condition, awarding benefits based upon a 25 percent PPD to the right lower extremity. Analyzing the medical evidence in the record, the court noted that the employee’s physician indicated she had degenerative disc disease in an evaluation one year before the work-related accident. At that time, the employee had described her discomfort as between moderate and severe. The doctor also opined that the employee would have needed a hip replacement at some point even without the work-related injury. The court said the Commission’s finding that the employee suffered from a preexisting functional loss was supported by competent evidence. While the physician assigned a 50 percent impairment, the evidence supported the Board’s apportionment award.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law(LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis
See Clements v. Augusta Health & Safety First Ins. Co., 2021 Va. App. LEXIS 148(Aug. 3, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, §§ 34.03, 90.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.