When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
Oakland, CA -- Payments for medical-legal evaluations and reports used to resolve medical disputes in California work injury claims have increased more than expected since a new Med-Legal Fee Schedule...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 6 June 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp and Hon. Clint Feddersen Questioning the Vocational Expert [a] Depositions Counsel will often need to take the deposition of the vocation expert. Live testimony of a vocational...
Oakland, CA – A bill that would give a presumption of compensability to farmworker heat-related injury claims if the employer is found to be out of compliance with Cal/OSHA’s outdoor heat illness...
A U.S. Bankruptcy Court, construing Wisconsin’s property exemptions law, Wisconsin Statute § 102.27, held that the sum of $400,000, which had been paid by the workers’ compensation carrier of the bankruptcy debtor’s employer into the trust account of the debtor’s attorney following the settlement of a contested claim, was held in trust for those that had provided the debtor with medical treatment. As such, the money was not a part of the bankruptcy estate and could not be claimed as exempt under § 102.27. The Court acknowledged the arrangement in which the debtor agreed to compromise the contested claim for $120,000 paid to the claimant, $30,000 paid to his attorney, with the $400,000 paid to the trust account “for disbursement to medical providers and lienholders,” amounted to an express trust. Since it was not part of the bankruptcy estate, the debtor could not seek to claim it as exempt property.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law(LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Branko PRPA MD LLC v. Ryan (In re Ryan), 2021 Bankr. LEXIS 739 (E.D. Wis., Mar. 24, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 89.07.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.