Position paper presented at CSIMS 2024 by Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Friends Research Institute (friendsresearch.org) Disclaimers: The opinions expressed in this article...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 8 August 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The June 13, 2024 edition of the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation...
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2024. The first...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board It is well understood that the California Insurance Guarantee Association...
Under Texas law, consistent with that in the large majority of states, a workers’ compensation carrier has a subrogation interest in a third-party civil action to the extent of its prior payments for benefits and to treat the amount recovered as an advance against the carrier’s future payment obligation. Here, for example, the third-party settlement involved a surviving spouse who had remarried and, therefore, would not be entitled to receive future benefits, and a number of surviving children, who would be entitled to future benefits. The trial court apportioned the largest share, some $350,000, to the surviving spouse and a smaller share, some $80,000, to the decedent’s children. The core issue was whether the carrier was obligated to resume benefit payments after allowing for an $80,000 credit, or was it required to being such payments only after giving it a credit for the entire $430,000. Answering a question certified to it by the Fiifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court of Texas held that under these facts, their had been but a single, collective recovery, rather than separate recoveries by each beneficiary. Accordingly, only after allowing the carrier a full credit of the $430,000 sum would it be required to reinstitute benefits payments.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See State Office of Risk Management v. Carty, 2014 Tex. LEXIS 503 (June 20, 2014) [2014 Tex. LEXIS 503 (June 20, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 117.01 [117.01]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site