By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
Where a widow sought workers’ compensation death benefits on behalf of herself and her son—the step-son of the deceased worker—and the widow died while the claim was still pending, the trial court erred when it granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment and held that neither the widow’s estate nor the step-son had standing to sue for benefits. The appellate court indicated that if the widow had been alive, she would have had standing to sue for the benefits to which she was entitled prior to her death. To deny her estate standing to seek benefits simply because she died while the employer was contesting liability would be contrary to the remedial purpose of the workers’ compensation statute. The stepson’s rights to benefits could not be extinguished by his mother’s death. To the extent that he was a statutory dependent of the deceased worker, he could recover benefits. He, therefore, had standing to sue.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Stamps v. Trinity Marine Prods., Inc., 2016 Tenn. LEXIS 185 (Mar. 22, 2016)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 89.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site