Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
COMPLEX EMPLOYMENT ISSUES FOR CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION A new softbound supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law 284 pages PIN #0006801214509 For...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
Where a caretaker’s primary responsibilities while working for a woman suffering from mild dementia were to get the woman ready for bed and make sure she stayed in bed throughout the evening, those duties fell within the domestic service exception of the Pennsylvania’s Workers’ Compensation Act [77 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 676] and the caretaker’s claim for benefits resulting from a work-related injury were not compensable, held a Pennsylvania appellate court.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Van Leer v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd., 2019 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 191 (Feb. 27, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 72.03.
Source:Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law