Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
COMPLEX EMPLOYMENT ISSUES FOR CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION A new softbound supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law 284 pages PIN #0006801214509 For...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
As is the case in a number of jurisdictions, in Oregon a presumptively responsible employer in an occupational disease claim may avoid liability, shifting such liability to a previous employment, if it can show that it was “impossible” for conditions at its own work site to have caused or worsened the claimant's disease. An Oregon appellate court reiterated that state law does not require a showing of “literal impossibility.” Here, the presumptively responsible employer’s expert admitted on cross examination that it was “possible” for the claimant to have experienced an increase in hearing loss of perhaps one percent after leaving the earlier employer. The doctor went on to say, however, that such a small change would not be medically significant. The previous employer argued that since it was “possible” for claimant’s condition to have worsened, there had been no showing of “impossibility.” The court disagreed.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Liberty Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. SAIF Corp. (In re Alcorn), 2019 Ore. App. LEXIS 154 (Jan. 30, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 153.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see