Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
COMPLEX EMPLOYMENT ISSUES FOR CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION A new softbound supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law 284 pages PIN #0006801214509 For...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
Where a trucker sustained injuries while performing a pre-employment driving test, he could not recover workers’ compensation benefits; he was not an “employee” within the meaning of Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.005(30), held the Supreme Court of Oregon. That the test drive involved the handling of actual freight and resulted in revenue for the prospective employer made no difference, said the Court. Citing Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the Court stressed there had been no contract of hire. The driver unsuccessfully argued that since Oregon law entitled him to the minimum wage for the time he spent (based upon the fact that the trip was revenue-generating for the trucking company).
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law(LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Gadalean v. SAIF Corp., 364 Ore. 707, 2019 Ore. LEXIS 271 (Apr. 18, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 60.01.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see