By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
Oakland, CA – California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 10 October 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Presiding Judge, WCAB Los Angeles, California Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article are solely those of...
Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
In an unusual case showing the importance of careful drafting of settlement agreements, a North Carolina appellate court recently held that an employer’s comp carrier was required to pay a deceased employee’s estate some $19,582.37 as “seed money” called for under a Medicare Set-Aside Agreement (“MSA”), in spite of the fact that between the time the agreement was executed and the required date of any payment, the injured employee died unexpectedly and, accordingly, there was no possibility that future medical payments would ever be owed by anyone. Prior to the employee’s death, the parties entered into a settlement agreement regarding the employee’s workers’ compensation claim whereby the carrier paid a lump sum of $250,000, plus various costs and expenses. As a part of the settlement, the carrier also agreed to the funding of the MSA in the amount of $186,032.51, with $19,582.37 “seed money” and payments of $9,247.23 annually for 18 years, if the employee was living. The Industrial Commission found that an implied condition of the mediated settlement agreement was that the employee be alive for the defendants to be required to fund the MSA. The appellate court disagreed, finding the seed money to be a guaranteed benefit.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Holmes v. Solon Automated Servs., 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1238 (Dec. 3, 2013) [2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1238 (Dec. 3, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 132.05 [132.05]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
_____________________________________________________________________
Special Discount Price $79*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
PROMO CODE: WCEIA
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice. Discount cannot be combined with other offers. Expires 12/31/2013.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site