By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the most common reasons evaluating physicians flunk the apportionment validity test is due to their...
Medical experts need not be shown to be experts in the narrow field that a party contends is relevant to the issue in the case—here whether the deceased former employee’s esophageal cancer resulted from asbestos exposure—it was sufficient that the experts were experienced in oncology, indicated a North Carolina appellate court recently. The employer’s expert’s testimony that the deceased’s cancer was not caused by asbestos exposure, but rather related to Barrett's esophagus was, therefore, supported by competent evidence. The deceased’s representative contended that her experts, who were experienced in esophageal cancer, should have been the only experts considered by the Commission, was erroneous, held the appellate court. Moreover, where a non-mandatory provision of federal law recognized the existence of an "association" between asbestos exposure and esophageal cancer, that provision was not dispositive of the issue of whether decedent's esophageal cancer was caused by asbestos exposure.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Wise v. Alcoa, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1235 (Dec. 3, 2013) [2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1235 (Dec. 3, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 128.05 [128.05]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
_____________________________________________________________________
Special Discount Price $79*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
PROMO CODE: WCEIA
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice. Discount cannot be combined with other offers. Expires 12/31/2013.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site