By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
Oakland, CA – California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 10 October 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Presiding Judge, WCAB Los Angeles, California Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article are solely those of...
Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
The North Carolina Industrial Commission properly denied a worker’s claim for benefits in connection with his alleged work-related asthma on the basis that he failed to present expert medical evidence to establish that the conditions of his employment placed him at a greater risk than members of the general public for contracting the disease or condition. The worker did submit medical testimony by deposition, in which the physician initially opined that the worker’s asthma was very likely caused by his environmental exposure at the employer’s facility. The physician did not know, however, that the worker (a) had smoked cigarettes after 2005; (b) had complained of wheezing in 2007 and 2008; and wore a respirator mask during the entirety of his employment with the employer. The physician ultimately testified that a different history might affect his opinions on causation. The worker contended his own testimony as to the dusty conditions at work was sufficient to establish his claim, but the appellate court disagreed. Such a determination was beyond a layperson's understanding given that questions as to the root causes of asthma could only be answered by medical experts.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Briggs v. Debbie’s Staffing, Inc., 2018 N.C. App. LEXIS 217 (Mar. 6, 2018)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 128.05.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law