By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
Oakland, CA – California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 10 October 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Presiding Judge, WCAB Los Angeles, California Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article are solely those of...
Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
A New York court affirmed the denial of two airborne illness claims filed by a makeup artist for Fox 5-TV, on the basis that she failed to show the required causal connection between her work and her illnesses. In her first claim, filed in December 2013, she asserted that, while at work, she had sustained multiple injuries from exposure to toxins and irritants, specifically, certain cleaning products. In her second claim, filed in February 2015, she asserted that she contracted a Bartonella bacterial infection from contact with dead rodents in her workplace. At a hearing, the claimant testified that she had observed one live mouse or rat at her place of employment some three months prior to her diagnosis of Bartonella infection. She indicated she had also touched what she believed to be rat droppings in previous years when she was at work. Her claim was undermined largely by the cross-examination of her medical expert. She had not disclosed to him that she had traveled for three months to Croatia during August 2013 (a few months before she contracted the illness). The doctor indicated that in light of that information, he could not state that she had contracted her condition at work.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis
See Matter of Petesic v Fox 5 N.Y., 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5719 (3rd Dept. July 18, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 51.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see