By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
The properly disallowed an employee’s claim for benefits under N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 15(4) because the claim abated upon the employee’s death since the record was undeveloped. The court noted that the employee had not testified or undergone an independent medical examination despite diligent efforts by the carrier to secure both before the worker’s death. While the record was thereafter developed with, among other things, testimony from the employee’s widow, as well as individuals associated with the employer, and a physician who had examined the employee before he died, there was no direct evidence detailing his work activities on the day he was injured or establishing that they led to his worsening physical condition.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the co-Editor-in-Chief and Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law(LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Scano v. Doccs Taconic Corr. Facility, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4165 (3d Dept., June 24, 2021)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 89.05.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.