By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
A New York appellate court affirmed a decision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board that denied a corporate bond trader’s application for an award of reduced earnings that he claimed were caused by a PTSD condition brought about by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. The broker worked on the 84th floor of the World Trade Center South Tower and escaped when the terrorist attack transpired. The court agreed with the Board that while there was no dispute that the bond trader suffered from PTSD, there was no medical opinion that he was incapable of engaging in his former profession and in fact, the trader engaged in his former profession for more than seven years after the attack and did not claim lost wages for most of that period. His lower earnings appeared to have been caused by several voluntary employment moves he made as well as his decision to start what turned out to be an unsuccessful bond brokerage business of his own.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See In the Matter of the Claim of Launer v. Euro Brokers, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2088 (Mar. 27, 2014) [2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2088 (Mar. 27, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 7.02, 84.01 [7.02, 84.01]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site