By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
The state’s Workers’ Compensation Board was within its discretion when it assessed a $500 fine against a New York claimant’s attorney under N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 114-a(3)(ii), after the attorney sought review of a decision by WCLJ denying a late payment penalty under N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 25(3)(f). At the hearing on the claimant’s petition seeking late payment penalties, the carrier argued that it had an additional day to pay the ordered benefits because of the Memorial Day holiday. The WCLJ agreed and ruled against the claimant. On appeal, the appellate court indicated there was but one reading of the statute. It was clear that the payment had been timely made and claimant’s appeal continued the proceeding without reasonable cause.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Matter of Curcio v Sherwood 370 Mgt., LLC, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6838 (3d Dept. Sept. 26, 2019)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 135.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see