By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the most common reasons evaluating physicians flunk the apportionment validity test is due to their...
An employer must provide benefits in a temporary award to a supervisor injured while driving to his office in a company-owned vehicle, according to the Commission in Jansen v Jackson County, 2014 Mo. WCLR Lexis 55 (lexis.com), 2014 Mo. WCLR Lexis 55 (Lexis Advance) (April 16, 2014), reversing a denial of benefits.
The narrow issue of statutory interpretation raised by the parties was whether 287.020.5 (lexis.com), 287.020.5 (Lexis Advance) barred any recovery.
"Injuries sustained in company-owned or subsidized automobiles in accidents that occur while traveling from the employee's home to the employer's principal place of business or from the employer's principal place of business to the employee's home are not compensable."
The Commission found the employer failed to show that claimant was traveling to its principal place of business to invoke the defense. The employer had many offices and the claimant worked in the Lee Summit facility which did not include offices for administrative functions, collection, HR, finance and purchase. Applying strict construction, the court considered the exclusion of accidents in company owned vehicles did not apply because the location was not the "employer's" principal place of business. The employer showed where claimant customarily worked but the location was not where it conducted its principal affairs.
The ALJ and Commission left unresolved whether the accident itself arose out of an in the course of employment.
Source: Martin Klug, Huck, Howe & Tobin. Read Martin Klug’s Mo. Workers’ Comp Alerts.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site