By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
Oakland, CA – California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 10 October 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Presiding Judge, WCAB Los Angeles, California Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article are solely those of...
Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
Where attorneys for an injured worker bring a successful action against a third party to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the worker in the course of his employment, thereby enabling the worker’s employer to obtain reimbursement of the compensation benefits that it is obligated to pay under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the Act requires the employer to pay 25% of the gross amount it obtains in reimbursement as attorney fees, absent some other agreement [see 820 ILCS 305/5(b)]. The gross amount of reimbursement subject to attorney fees includes not only workers’ compensation benefits already paid at the time of the third-party recovery, but also the amount of such benefits the employer will be relieved from having to pay in the future by reason of the worker’s recovery in the third-party action. Thus, the value of future medical care should be included in this calculation, held the Supreme Court of Illinois.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Bayer v. Panduit Corp. Area Erectors, 2016 IL 119553, 2016 Ill. LEXIS 772 (Sept. 22, 2016)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 117.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law