By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
Oakland, CA – California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 10 October 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, Presiding Judge, WCAB Los Angeles, California Division of Workers’ Compensation Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article are solely those of...
Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
Construing Texas law, a federal district court has held that an employee of a “non-subscribing employer” under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act could maintain a negligence action against the employer following a slip and fall incident as the employee attempted to retrieve shopping carts in the employer’s icy parking lot. The employer contended the employee could not maintain the action, but rather was limited to filing a premises liability claim. The distinction was important; since the employer was a “non-subscriber” it could not utilize common law defenses, such as contributory negligence or assumption of the risk in any negligence action. If the injured employee were required to proceed under the premises liability theory, those defenses would have been available. The district court, after providing a thorough review of the applicable case law from Texas, held that here the employee could sue in negligence. Since the employer had raised no other defenses, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Odom v. Kroger Texas, L.P., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18682 (N.D. Tex., Feb. 14, 2014) [2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18682 (N.D. Tex., Feb. 14, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 102.01 [102.01]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site
_____________________________________________________________________
Price $99*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice.