By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
The Supreme Court of California, in a 5-2 decision, held that the state's "posse" law--Cal. Labor Code § 3366--barred a civil action for negligence and misrepresentation filed by two private citizens against a California county and a deputy sheriff following a bizarre circumstance in which the plaintiffs barely escaped with their lives. After the sheriff's office had received word that a neighbor of the plaintiffs might be in trouble, a deputy called the plaintiffs, a husband and wife, and asked that they check on the neighbor. The deputy did not divulge information suggesting that there was criminal activity ongoing at the neighbor's house and instead indicated it was likely related to a winter storm. Upon their arrival, the couple were attacked by a man who had murdered the neighbor and her boyfriend. Both the husband and wife sustained grave injuries in the encounter. The majority held the couple had been engaged in "active law enforcement" and that their exclusive remedy was pursuant to California's Workers' Compensation Act.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis
See Gund v. County of Trinity, 2020 Cal. LEXIS 5542 (Aug. 27, 2020)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 28.03.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see
Sign up for the free LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation enewsletter at www.lexisnexis.com/wcnews.