By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The battle of the bill review experts is on! This issue was the focus of the recent Noteworthy Panel Decision...
By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article...
Oakland, CA – The decline in opioid use in California workers’ compensation has outpaced the decline among the state’s overall population according to a new California Workers’...
By Julius Young, Richard Jacobsmeyer, Barry Bloom, Editors-in-Chief for Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Handbook [Note: This article is excerpted from the upcoming 2025 edition of Herlick...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
The Corado panel decision involves an important procedural matter. Normally, expedited hearings can only be set when liability for an injury is accepted. The exception is when a DOR for an expedited hearing is filed in a dispute over the selection of a panel QME or treating physician under Labor Code section 5502(b)(3). The Appeals Board in Corado makes it clear that Rule 10782 and the Policy and Procedure Manual are inconsistent with the statute. So if a dispute arises in a denied injury case over the selection of a panel QME under Labor Code section 4060, the judge has to make a record and the matter can proceed to the expedited hearing on that issue. Read the decision (see PDF below).
Reminder: Panel decisions are not binding precedent.