By Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are...
Oakland, CA – Private self-insured claim volume in the California workers' compensation system fell 9.5% in 2023, producing the biggest year-to-year decline in private self-insured claim frequency...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board No matter the source of your media consumption, it seems that the topic...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Who doesn’t agree with the fact that “[w]e should not interpret or apply statutory language...
When do the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code section 3600 permit an action for law at damages? By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’...
As is the case in a number of states, Arizona allows “apportionment” of certain permanent injury claims between an employer and a “special fund” where the employee’s permanency results from the combination of a pre-existing condition and a subsequent work-related injury. Not all pre-existing conditions will support apportionment, however. For example, in Arizona, if the pre-existing condition is a “psychoneurotic disability,” the claimant must have received treatment for that condition “in a recognized medical or mental institution” [see Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23–1065(C)(3)(n)]. An Arizona appellate court has held that where, prior to sustaining a back injury with the employer, an employee served in the military for several years, completed a tour of duty in Iraq, and thereafter experienced PTSD, depression, and anxiety, her outpatient treatment at a VA clinic constituted “treatment in a recognized medical or mental institution” within the meaning of the statute.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis
See Special Fund Div. v. Industrial Comm’n of Ariz. (La Palma Correctional Ctr.), 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 148 (June 21, 2016)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 91.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.