Oakland, CA – Migraine Drugs represented less than 1% of all prescriptions dispensed to California injured workers in 2023 but they consumed 4.7% of workers’ compensation drug payments, a nearly...
COMPLEX EMPLOYMENT ISSUES FOR CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION A new softbound supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law 284 pages PIN #0006801214509 For...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
A provision in the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Act (Alaska Stat., § 23.30.055) that bars a non-dependent parent from suing the employer for negligence allegedly associated with the death of an employed child is constitutional, held the Supreme Court of Alaska, in spite of the fact that the same non-dependent parents is not entitled to any workers’ compensation death benefits. The Court, quoting Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, said tradeoffs were inevitable within the “grand bargain.” The mother’s wrongful death claim was derivative of her daughter’s work-related injuries. As such the employer could not be sued.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance.
See Burke v. Raven Elec., 2018 Alas. LEXIS 64 (May 11, 2018)
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, §§ 100.05, 101.02.
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see