DHS, June 28, 2024 "Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas today announced the extension and redesignation of Haiti for Temporary Protected Status for 18 months, from Aug. 4, 2024...
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo What will it mean for immigration litigation? Superlitigator Brian Green says, "The overruling of Chevron opens the door to U.S. federal judges scrutinizing...
OFLC, June 26, 2024 "On November 15, 2021, the Employment and Training Administration issued a Federal Register notice (FRN) informing the public that the Office of Foreign Labor Certification ...
Cyrus D. Mehta and Kaitlyn Box, June 25, 2024 "On June 18, 2024, the Biden administration announced two new immigration initiatives aimed at keeping families together. The first is a “parole...
Alfaro Manzano v. Garland "Petitioner Gerson Eduardo Alfaro Manzano, a native and citizen of El Salvador, preached to the youth of his hometown to convince them to embrace religion instead of joining...
In an unpublished, three-member panel (GREER, Wendtland; O'Connor dissenting) decision dated April 24, 2019, the BIA stated:
"[B]ased on a straightforward application of the categorical approach outlined in Taylor and its progeny, we must conclude that the DHS has not met its burden of establishing by 'clear and convincing evidence' that the respondent's conviction for grand larceny in the second degree under New York law renders her removable as charged under section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act."
[Hats off to Michael Z. Goldman!]