EOIR, July 2, 2024 "The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) today announced the launch of Respondent Access Portal , a secure online platform that allows unrepresented individuals who...
Nash v. Mikesell "A division of the court of appeals considers whether Colorado law prohibits state or local law enforcement officers from performing the arrest and detention functions of federal...
VELAZQUEZ V. GARLAND DECISION BELOW: 88 F.4th 1301 (CA10) CERT. GRANTED 7/2/2024 QUESTION PRESENTED: Federal immigration law allows the government to grant a "voluntary departure" period...
Gutierrez v. Garland "Sergio Manrique Gutierrez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an order of removal by an Immigration...
BIA, June 28, 2024 "The Board of Immigration Appeals welcomes interested members of the public to file amicus curiae briefs discussing the below issue(s): ISSUE(S) PRESENTED: What is the scope of...
In June 2011, DHS announced the initiative would improve efficiency in an overburdened system, provide relief from deportation for men, women, and children who pose no threat to our communities, and focus resources on deporting dangerous criminals, recent border crossers, and egregious immigration law violators. However, only 1.5 percent of individuals in immigration proceedings have had their cases closed through prosecutorial discretion, including only 22 people in the region covered by the Chicago immigration court.
“The government must implement a meaningful prosecutorial discretion policy that corrects the injustices that are rampant in our country’s immigration system. Last week, the administration took a notable step when it announced that it will stop the deportations of DREAM Act-eligible youth. We remain concerned about the thousands of other immigrants—including the family members of DREAMers—who still need protection,” said NIJC Director of Legal Services Mony Ruiz-Velasco. “Until the administration’s original commitment to exercise prosecutorial discretion for ‘low-priority’ immigrants is fulfilled, families will still be torn apart. We must continue to hold the administration accountable for its promises.”
The lawsuit calls on the administration to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in October 2011, which asked for any information and internal correspondence regarding the rollout of the much-lauded prosecutorial discretion initiative. The request also asked for data about the number of people who have been granted or denied prosecutorial discretion.
NIJC is represented by pro bono lawyers at SNR Denton." - NIJC, June 18, 2012.
Click here to download the complaint in NIJC v. DHS et. al.