EOIR, July 2, 2024 "The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) today announced the launch of Respondent Access Portal , a secure online platform that allows unrepresented individuals who...
Nash v. Mikesell "A division of the court of appeals considers whether Colorado law prohibits state or local law enforcement officers from performing the arrest and detention functions of federal...
VELAZQUEZ V. GARLAND DECISION BELOW: 88 F.4th 1301 (CA10) CERT. GRANTED 7/2/2024 QUESTION PRESENTED: Federal immigration law allows the government to grant a "voluntary departure" period...
Gutierrez v. Garland "Sergio Manrique Gutierrez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an order of removal by an Immigration...
BIA, June 28, 2024 "The Board of Immigration Appeals welcomes interested members of the public to file amicus curiae briefs discussing the below issue(s): ISSUE(S) PRESENTED: What is the scope of...
Andrew Free writes - "See ... today's decision from Judge John S. Bryant, a Magistrate Judge in the Middle District of Tennessee. The Court previously granted Plaintiffs' motion for a protective order regarding their immigration status and that of third-party witnesses. ICE defendants' counsel claimed it was "absurd" to force the ICE agents to leave a deposition room while such questioning took place. The Judge disagreed. The case is Nunez-Escobar v. Gaines, No. 3:11-cv-994 (M.D. Tenn. filed Oct. 19, 2011). It's being litigated by Hughes, Socol, Piers, Resnick & Dym, Ltd of Chicago, the ACLU-IRP, the ACLU of Tennessee, and Ozment Law. Our hat goes off to Andre Segura and Justin Cox at ACLU-IRP, Jenna Miara, Cara Hendrickson, and Jose Behar and Hughes Socol, and Tricia Herzfeld at Ozment Law."