CA5, Oct. 10, 2024, MP3 recording 23-40653 10/10/2024 State of Texas v. USA Brian Boynton- Jeremy M. Feigenbaum- Joseph N. Mazzara- Nina Perales-
USCIS, Oct. 10, 2024 "U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to reflect the recently published final rule to codify the automatic...
Major Disaster Vermont Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides Impacted Areas Frequently Asked Questions September 30, 2024 Major Disaster Hurricane Helene Impacted Areas Frequently Asked...
Meza Diaz v. Garland "Petitioner Briseyda Meza Diaz (“Meza Diaz”) and her minor daughter, Gabriela Segundo Meza (“GSM”), fled Mexico after suffering a home invasion by hooded...
Q & A and slides from Sept. 12, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement
NILA, Nov. 8, 2021
"Three Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders filed a class action lawsuit challenging U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ decision to rescind a decades-old policy which allowed them to seek lawful permanent resident status (green cards).
Immigration law permits TPS holders to travel abroad temporarily with prior agency approval. For nearly three decades, USCIS and its predecessor found such individuals, upon their lawful return to the United States, to have been “inspected and admitted or paroled”—one of the requirements for gaining lawful permanent resident status. In August 2020, however, USCIS adopted Matter of Z-R-Z-C-, an Administrative Appeals Office decision holding that a TPS holder’s lawful return did not satisfy the inspection and admission or parole requirement. Instead, under current policy, TPS holders who first entered the United States without inspection are found ineligible for green cards even after they are subsequently inspected upon returning from travel abroad.
All Plaintiffs have maintained TPS for at least twenty years and now seek to become lawful permanent residents through their U.S. citizen spouses. They all traveled abroad temporarily with permission and lawfully returned to the United States after August 2020. All of them would be eligible for green cards but for USCIS’s current policy, which does not recognize them as being inspected and admitted or paroled.
Represented by the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, National Immigration Litigation Alliance, and Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin, the plaintiffs allege that USCIS’s policy violates the Immigration and Nationality Act and agency regulations. The lawsuit asks the court to prohibit the agency from applying the new policy and to order USCIS to reopen and readjudicate any class members’ applications that were denied.
“In adopting Matter of Z-R-Z-C- as agency policy, USCIS shut the door to permanent residency for an untold number of noncitizens who have lived for years in lawful Temporary Protected Status,” said Mary Kenney, Deputy Director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. “The decision—which abruptly reversed three decades of agency policy—is legally flawed and unnecessarily harsh.”
“USCIS’s policy violates the admissions framework Congress created and harms valued members of our community,” said Leila Kang, a staff attorney at NWIRP. “TPS holders who have built their families and livelihoods in the U.S. should not be deprived of the opportunity to remain with their loved ones.”
The complaint can be viewed here."
#####
Media contacts:
Mary Kenney, National Immigration Litigation Alliance(617) 819-4681; mary@immigrationlitigation.org
Leila Kang, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project(206) 816-3847; leila@nwirp.org