DOS, July 15, 2024 " On June 18, 2024, the Biden-Harris Administration announced actions to more efficiently process employment-based nonimmigrant visas for those who have graduated from college...
Cyrus D. Mehta and Jessica Paszko, July 13, 2024 "Portability under Section 204(j) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) allows certain employment-based green card applicants to change jobs...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/12/2024 "The Department of State (the Department) publishes a final rule revising the Code of Federal Regulations to amend...
Visa Bulletin for August 2024
Azumah v. USCIS - Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge Harris wrote the opinion, in which Judge Thacker joined. Judge Richardson wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in...
Azumah v. USCIS - Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge Harris wrote the opinion, in which Judge Thacker joined. Judge Richardson wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. ARGUED: Benjamin Ross Winograd, IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE APPELLATE CENTER, LLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. ON BRIEF: Ava Cayetano Benach, BENACH COLLOPY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
"As the government concedes, Azumah was in fact “lawfully admitted for permanent residence” at all times relevant to this case – in 2010, in 2014, and when he sought citizenship – because at all those times, he had the status of a legal permanent resident of the United States. That is enough to satisfy the statutory requirement at issue. And we do not read the agency regulation now pressed by the government to impose upon Azumah the additional burden of showing that he was “lawfully admitted” – rather than paroled – when he returned to the United States in 2014. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
[Hats way off to Ava Benach and Ben Winograd! Listen to the oral argument here.]