BIB Daily presents bimonthly PERM practice tips from Ron Wada , member of the Editorial Board for Bender’s Immigration Bulletin and author of the 10+ year series of BALCA review articles, “Shaping...
Montejo-Gonzalez v. Garland (2-1) "On their way to an initial hearing before an immigration judge (“IJ”) in Seattle, Washington, Claudia Elena Montejo-Gonzalez and her two minor children...
Acacia Center for Justice "Join us today, Thursday, October 17, 2024 at 3:00-4:30 pm ET for a webinar on how legal service providers can overcome burnout. We will explore strategies that policymakers...
USCIS, Oct. 15, 2024 "DHS recently issued a new class of admission (COA) of Military Parole in Place (MIL) to better reflect parole granted under a longstanding process for certain U.S. military...
Attorney Alan Lee has thoughts: SHIFTING DATES OF AGE BEING FROZEN AND REFROZEN UNDER THE CSPA AND THE CONSEQUENCES, PART 1 SHIFTING DATES OF AGE BEING FROZEN AND REFROZEN UNDER THE CSPA AND THE CONSEQUENCES...
"A federal appeals court has ruled that Maine did not run afoul of the Constitution by ending state-funded medical care for some legal aliens who are ineligible for Medicaid. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held Monday that the class action plaintiffs in Bruns v. Mayhew have not made a valid claim under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling affirmed U.S. District Judge John Woodcock Jr.'s March 2013 denial of a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of the law. The panel remanded the case to Woodcock, the District of Maine’s chief judge, and directed him to dismiss it. The case concerns benefits for legal aliens whose Medicaid and other federal benefits were reduced by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. Maine provided that group with state-funded medical benefits from 1997 to 2011." - Sheri Qualters, The National Law Journal, April 29, 2014.