DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
Katie Traverso and Jennie Pasquarella, ACLU of Southern California - "This advisory discusses United States Citizenship and Immigration Service’s (“USCIS”) Controlled Application Review and Resolution Program, or “CARRP.” In 2008, USCIS created CARRP as its policy for identifying, screening, and adjudicating applications for immigrant benefits, including naturalization, adjustment of status, and asylum, from individuals it considers a “national security concern.”
CARRP relies upon overbroad and discriminatory criteria to flag applicants for immigration benefits as national security concerns, particularly those who are Muslim or from Muslim-majority countries. It then directs USCIS officers to delay and ultimately deny their applications—all without informing applicants they are subject to the policy, let alone giving them an opportunity to respond to the agency’s classification of them as a “national security concern.”
This advisory: (I) provides an overview of CARRP; (II) describes the possible impact of CARRP on a client’s immigration application; (III) provides a checklist to help determine if a client is likely subject to CARRP; (IV) provides advice and considerations for litigating cases subject to CARRP; (V) discusses administrative appeals and federal court actions; and (VI) offers guidance on filing requests under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”)."