The best way to learn about the tax considerations for buyers and sellers in M&A transactions is to study the different M&A deal types. This practice note focuses on the typical tax consequences...
While landlords initiate many evictions for rent payment defaults, they also evict tenants for other lease breaches and violations of federal, state, or local laws. Both landlords and tenants should familiarize...
Representations and warranties insurance (RWI) continues to evolve to meet the challenges of today’s M&A market. Keep your skills and knowledge sharp with RWI resources from Practical Guidance...
Are you interested in recent key legal developments in transgender law in the workplace? Watch our new Transgender Employee Compliance in the Workplace: Key Employer Steps Video , by Kimberley E. Lunetta...
The Bankruptcy Code provides that a bankruptcy court can confirm a plan can only if at least one impaired class of non-insider creditors votes to accept the plan (If any class of creditors under the plan is impaired). In cases involving multiple debtors that are not substantively consolidated, courts are divided over the question of whether an impaired class of each debtor must accept the plan (the per debtor approach) or whether the acceptance of the joint plan by an impaired class of a single debtor, or fewer than all of the debtors, is sufficient (the per plan approach). Be sure to read this article discussing a recent bankruptcy court decision addressing the per debtor / per plan issue.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+