Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Will 2022 Be the Year of the Reasonable Mortality Table?

January 19, 2022 (2 min read)

Several cases are percolating in 2022 that spotlight ERISA. Among them, Hughes v. Northwestern University, on which SCOTUS heard oral arguments in early December, and which focuses light on the pleading standards required to challenge retirement savings plans. See Oral arguments transcript. SCOTUS also has been asked to review Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. That program, already representing 11,000 employers and having combined assets over $85M, requires a portion of California workers' earnings to be automatically deposited into IRAs, where the employer does not otherwise maintain a retirement savings program for those workers. And in Belknap v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc., a Massachusetts district court will consider a challenge to the mortality tables that the defined benefit plan of a large Massachusetts healthcare employer has relied on in calculating annuity payments, or their actuarial equivalents. Will reasonableness matter?  

READ NOW »


Related Content

  • The “Gaming” of Pension Plan Actuarial Assumptions
    Learn about other case challenges to defined benefit plan actuarial assumptions, which reference mortality tables and interest rates. According to the Belknap complaint, the employer used "typical and up-to-date actuarial assumptions" when calculating the value of all benefit forms for its financial statements and used “1950s-era inputs” (i.e., an interest rate of 7.5% and a 1951 Group Annuity Mortality Table) to calculate actuarial equivalence for joint and survivor benefits.

 

Practical Guidance Updates

Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.   


Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.

Experience Lexis+