In May 2025, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, along with a separate statement by SEC Commissioner Peirce, released FAQs that provide long-awaited clarity on the regulatory treatment of...
Both the House and Senate versions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed by the House on May 22, 2025, and the Senate on July 1, 2025, phase out tax credits for wind, solar, and electric vehicle...
Playbooks help attorneys review, draft, and negotiate contracts efficiently and consistently by comparing favored contract language with fallback language and providing drafting guidance and negotiation...
In the intricate world of M&A transactions, tax considerations often determine deal viability, structure optimization, and ultimate value creation. Navigate the complex landscape where strategic tax...
This practice note covers the development, regulation, and reimbursement of laboratory developed tests (LDTs), which are typically used when an FDA-approved test does not exist, when FDA-approved tests...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
The judge in the Epic-Apple antitrust case, involving Apple’s app store, faces limited legal precedents and complex market realities. In other words, the type of setting that makes antitrust fun.
READ NOW: Judge in Epic Games-Apple US antitrust case faces stark choices, limited legal precedents
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+