When tax-exempt or non-U.S. taxpayers invest in U.S. businesses, unwanted and unintended U.S. tax obligations can follow without careful planning. Blocker corporations have become a common strategy employed...
Obtaining a Phase I environmental site assessment (ESA) is essential to conducting environmental due diligence for commercial real estate transactions. The goal of a Phase I ESA is to evaluate readily...
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools and resources are inundating the news, social media, professional seminars, and inboxes. AI is part of every conversation across industries and professional services...
Do you need guidance in defending against claims brought under the recently overhauled California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA)? Read Private Attorneys General Act in California: Defending...
Confidently present your case in chief to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with this opening trial brief that an opposer/petitioner (plaintiff) may use in an opposition or cancellation proceeding...
For at least two decades, legislators have expressed concerns that investment fund managers who receive payments attributable to carried interests (e.g., partnership interests in a partnership received for certain investment management services) are obtaining the benefit of long-term capital gains rates on what otherwise should be treated as ordinary income. There have been several legislative proposals to curb what some legislators perceive as a loophole under the tax system associated with the grant of carried interests to private fund managers. This practice note discusses the carried interest rules under I.R.C. § 1061 (26 U.S.C. § 1061) and its application to private investment funds and their U.S.-based managers. READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+