Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Supreme Court Scrutinizes Impact Fees for Real Estate Developments

July 02, 2024 (1 min read)

Many local governments charge development impact fees, which are typically used to fund local infrastructure. However, the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Sheetz v. County of El Dorado decision, clarifying that the Takings Clause applies to municipal development impact fees, will likely cause cities and counties across the country to reevaluate their impact fee program to ensure compliance. Read this article for additional information. 

Read now »

Related Content

Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.

  • Review this guidance, AI and Legal Ethics: What Lawyers Need to Know, in the Summer Edition of the Practical Guidance Journal. Explore insights from a judge into the use of GenAI in civil litigation, including discovery issues, use cases, and key takeaways. Also advance your career with professional and business development guidance.
  • Legal Developments provide the latest updates and analyses of emerging topics impacting your practice area. Visit the Legal Developments page to see the latest topics, which also include breaking legal news and related Practical Guidance content. 
  • Listen Up! The Practical Guidance and Law360 Podcasts Resource Kit features interviews with industry-leading attorneys on cutting edge issues in the law: NFTs, Cannabis, COVID, and more.
  • Learn about the 2000+ leading attorney authors contributing to our 26 practice areas in the Practical Guidance Author Center. Interested in becoming a Practical Guidance author? Click here for details. Practical Guidance is committed to amplifying diverse voices of attorneys across all differences, including gender and race.

PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB

Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.

Experience Lexis+

Tags: