For U.S. tax purposes, digital assets are considered property, not currency. A digital asset is stored electronically and can be bought, sold, owned, transferred, or traded. The tax definition of a digital...
Manufactured housing communities (MHCs), also commonly referred to as mobile home parks, continue to increase in popularity, while state and local regulations governing them also continue to expand. Read...
Parties come together to form joint ventures when all involved believe that they will have greater success working cooperatively on a specific project, product, or business than they would have if they...
Learn best practices for advocating on behalf of your FDA-regulated clients in light of the new legal paradigm introduced by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Loper Bright and Corner Post . Read...
Do you need to learn about potential legal and business risks stemming from the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to manage employee performance and make employment decisions (e.g., screening,...
On July 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in Drazen v. Pinto, No. 21-10199, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 20766 (11th Cir. July 27, 2022), confirming for the first time that absent putative class members must have Article III standing. Check out this article for expert insights on this decision’s potentially broad, sweeping implications for not only Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class actions but any class action where Article III standing is called into question and circuit splits exist.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+