When tax-exempt or non-U.S. taxpayers invest in U.S. businesses, unwanted and unintended U.S. tax obligations can follow without careful planning. Blocker corporations have become a common strategy employed...
Obtaining a Phase I environmental site assessment (ESA) is essential to conducting environmental due diligence for commercial real estate transactions. The goal of a Phase I ESA is to evaluate readily...
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools and resources are inundating the news, social media, professional seminars, and inboxes. AI is part of every conversation across industries and professional services...
Do you need guidance in defending against claims brought under the recently overhauled California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA)? Read Private Attorneys General Act in California: Defending...
Confidently present your case in chief to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with this opening trial brief that an opposer/petitioner (plaintiff) may use in an opposition or cancellation proceeding...
Among the social infrastructure changes proposed by the Ways & Means Committee for the “Build Back Better Agenda” relating to retirement are reforms imposing an excise tax on employers for failing to maintain or facilitate automatic contribution plans or arrangements that enroll workers in IRAs, SIMPLE retirement accounts, or 401(k) retirement plans. The proposal would start employee elective contributions at 6% (adding Sections 414(aa) and 4980J to the Internal Revenue Code). Budget Reconciliation Legislative Recommendations Relating to Retirement, Section 131001. A contemplated excise tax would apply to deter offenders, equal to $10/day/employee during a noncompliance period. The retirement provisions are part of the social infrastructure additions to the budget reconciliation bill, which may include historic changes to both paid family medical leave, the private retirement savings system, and the refundable saver’s credit. See Ways & Means Committee, Markup of the Build Back Better Act, Subtitle B. While the initiative would cost the Fed, a number of tax increases would help pay for the savings initiative and other Build Back Better Agenda social initiatives.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+