Illinois Brick Repealers

In Illinois Brick v. Illinois, the Supreme Court held that indirect purchasers (those who purchase from an intermediary) had no standing under the federal antitrust laws. However, various states allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws. Our survey provides a list of states that do not follow the Illinois Brick doctrine in their state antitrust or consumer protection law, by either statute or case law, and therefore allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws.

Read Now »

Related Content

• Monetary Recoveries in Civil Antitrust Cases
  Understand monetary remedies under the antitrust laws.

• Equitable Relief in Civil Antitrust Actions
  Understand equitable remedies under the antitrust laws.

Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.

• DOJ/FTC Antitrust Case Tracker (Merger)
• DOJ Antitrust Case Tracker (Civil Nonmerger)
• FTC Antitrust Case Tracker (Civil Nonmerger)
• Legal Developments provide the latest updates and analyses of emerging topics impacting your practice area. Visit the Legal Developments page to see the latest topics, which also include breaking legal news and related Practical Guidance content.
• Document alerts allow you to stay current on legal developments that affect your practice. Find out how to set up your document alerts.

Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.

Experience Lexis+