Brick by Illinois Brick

In 1997, in Illinois Brick v. Illinois, the Supreme Court held that indirect purchasers had no standing under the federal antitrust laws. However, state laws, known as Illinois Brick repealers, may still allow indirect purchaser suits. Our Illinois Brick Repealer State Law Survey provides a list of states that do not follow the Illinois Brick doctrine in their state antitrust or consumer protection law, by either statute or case law, and therefore allow for some type of recovery by or on behalf of indirect purchasers under state laws.

READ NOW »

Related Content

• Standing in Antitrust Cases
  Know who can sue under the antitrust laws.
• Monetary Recoveries in Civil Antitrust Cases
  Learn what types of monetary damages plaintiffs may recover.

Practical Guidance Updates

Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.

• Federal Merger Enforcement Tracker
• Market Trends 2020: Merger Remedies
• Market Trends 2020: FTC Commissioner Statements in Merger Enforcement Actions
• Document alerts allow you to stay current on legal developments that affect your practice. Find out how to set up your document alerts.

Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.

Experience Lexis+