By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the most common reasons evaluating physicians flunk the apportionment validity test is due to their...
Affirming a trial court’s entry of a judgment against a former employer for $412,680 in compensatory and punitive damages in a former employee’s retaliatory discharge action, an Indiana appellate court held that there were issues of fact as to retaliatory discharge and invasion of privacy claims and that the jury had made appropriate findings in favor of the plaintiff, the former employee. The appellate court acknowledged that evidence that an employee was physically unable to perform the tasks required by his pre-injury work could, under very specific circumstances, serve as a legitimate non-retaliatory basis for termination. The court added, however, that it would be contrary to public policy to hold that an employer may not fire an employee in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim, but that an employer may fire an employee for the inability to return to his job due to the injuries that were the basis for the workers’ compensation claim. This was especially the case where, as here, the employee was discharged well before the full extent of permanent injury was known. The court noted that following the employee’s injury, the work atmosphere became rancorous and that one of the owners had even posted a statement on Facebook® accusing the injured employee of malingering.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is the co-author of Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis).
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Best Formed Plastics, LLC v. Shoun, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 41 (Feb. 16, 2016) [2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 41 (Feb. 16, 2016)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 104.07 [104.07]
For a more detailed discussion of the case, see http://www.workcompwriter.com/facebook-plays-role-in-indiana–400000-verdict-for-retaliatory-discharge/
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site